Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1609

reference
542-tree-1
name
1609
tree-preservation-order

undefined

542-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023471 50.884309)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023414 50.884303,-1.023416 50.884314,-1.023424 50.884324,-1.023437 50.884332,-1.023453 50.884337,-1.023470 50.884339,-1.023488 50.884338,-1.023504 50.884333,-1.023516 50.884325,-1.023525 50.884315,-1.023528 50.884304,-1.023525 50.884293,-1.023517 50.884283,-1.023505 50.884275,-1.023489 50.884269,-1.023472 50.884267,-1.023454 50.884269,-1.023438 50.884274,-1.023425 50.884282,-1.023417 50.884292,-1.023414 50.884303)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL